Tag Archives: GRC

Business

Compliance Is Not a Tax. It’s a Sales Accelerator

Most founders treat compliance as a necessary evil — somewhere on the spectrum between filing taxes and getting a root canal. You spend three months scrambling for an audit, pay consultants thousands of dollars, take endless screenshots, answer 200 questions, receive a shiny PDF… and instantly forget about it until next year.

That’s completely backwards.

The best engineering and GTM teams don’t build compliance because an auditor asked for it. They build it because customers buy faster when they trust you.

When you stop treating SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, or CMMC as part of your IT maintenance budget and start treating them as core go-to-market features, your sales velocity changes overnight.

The Hidden Tax: The 24-Day Black Hole

Every startup optimizes for engineering velocity. Founders obsess over CAC, LTV, net retention, and burn rate. Then, a $250k enterprise deal hits a wall:

“Our InfoSec team just has a few quick questions before procurement can sign.”

Three weeks later, your lead architect is still filling out Question #147 of a security questionnaire that looks like it escaped Microsoft Excel in 2004.

Continue reading →
Standard
Business

Understanding the CMMC Pause: Key Changes and Action Steps

On July 13, 2026, the Department of War announced the immediate suspension of CMMC Phase II requirements. The move was memorialized in a memo dated July 10, 2026, signed by DoW Chief Information Officer Kirsten Davies. Those requirements had been scheduled to take effect on November 10, 2026, and would have pushed many contracts handling Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) into mandatory third-party C3PAO assessments.

The stated goal is straightforward: reduce compliance barriers for small, medium, and non-traditional businesses so the Defense Industrial Base can expand faster under the Department’s current acquisition priorities.
A 60-day CMMC Reform Task Force review is now underway, including a public Request for Information seeking industry input on cost drivers and administrative burden. Phase I self-assessment requirements remain firmly in place.

This is not a free pass.
It’s a pause on one layer of bureaucracy — not a suspension of the underlying security obligations.

What Actually Changed (and What Didn’t)

Suspended

  • The November 2026 transition to Phase II — third-party Level 2 assessments as a condition of award in many cases.
  • Pending and future CMMC implementation milestones (including Phase III and IV) that would have required C3PAO or DIBCAC assessments.
  • During the review period, contracting officers are limited to requiring only Level 1 (Self) or Level 2 (Self) assessments in new procurements.
  • Existing contracts that already contain Phase II language will have that language removed by modification, either before the next option period or at the next scheduled administrative update.

Still fully in force

  • Phase I self-assessments and annual affirmations in SPRS.
  • DFARS 252.204-7012 obligations to protect covered defense information and implement NIST SP 800-171 controls.
  • Contractual cybersecurity requirements that primes flow down to subcontractors.
  • The Department of Justice’s Civil Cyber-Fraud Initiative, which continues to treat inaccurate self-assessments and false claims seriously.

The official release is worth reading in full: Forging the Arsenal of Freedom: Department of War Suspends CMMC Phase II Requirements. The SBA has also publicly backed the move, arguing the prior framework was pushing small firms out of the defense supply chain.

In short: the certification theater got paused. The requirement to actually protect the data did not.

Continue reading →
Standard
Business

GRC Platforms vs. Managed Compliance: Understanding the Gaps

TL;DR

A GRC platform tells you where you stand. A managed compliance service (in theory) does the standing-up.
Before you sign either contract, make someone in the room answer this out loud:
when a control fails at 2 a.m., who fixes it, how fast, and how do we know it actually happened?
If nobody can answer that today, that’s the gap you’re actually buying a solution for — not the framework name on the badge.

Btw, If the 2 a.m. question above didn’t have a clean answer, it’s worth a look at what a fully managed model covers versus what’s still sitting on your team’s plate. Check out the Espresso Labs platform

If you’ve bought a GRC (governance, risk management, and compliance) tool in the last five years, you’ve probably had this moment: the dashboard is green, the auditor is happy, and yet you still have an unencrypted laptop sitting in someone’s bag, a service account with a password from 2021, and a patch cadence that only exists on paper. The tool told you the truth. It just didn’t fix anything.

That gap — between visibility and operationalization — is worth thinking about carefully, because it’s where a lot of compliance budget quietly goes to die.

What GRC platforms like Vanta and Drata actually solve

Vanta and Drata deserve real credit. They replaced the compliance shared-spreadsheet — the one where “evidence” meant a screenshot pasted into a folder six weeks before the audit. What they do well:

  • Pull control status from the tools you already run via read-only integrations
  • Map passing/failing checks to a framework (SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, CMMC, etc.)
  • Automate evidence collection so audit season isn’t a fire drill
  • Alert you when something drifts out of policy

For a company with a mature security function — people who own EDR, MDM, SSO, backup, and vulnerability management day to day — this is exactly the layer you want. It turns “prove you’re compliant” from an annual archaeology project into a live, queryable system.

The quiet assumption baked into that model

Here’s the thing these platforms assume, and it’s almost never stated out loud in the sales process: you already have the underlying security program.

The dashboard reports on controls; it doesn’t implement them, enforce them, or fix them when they break.

When Vanta flags an unencrypted disk, or Drata flags a stale account, that finding lands in a queue. Someone — on your team, or a vendor you’ve separately hired — has to:

  1. Triage it
  2. Actually go fix it (device by device, user by user)
  3. Confirm the fix took
  4. Make sure it doesn’t regress next sprint

For a company with a five-person security team and a mature IT function, that’s Tuesday. For the median SMB or mid-market company — the ones without a dedicated security engineer, running IT through an MSP or a stretched-thin generalist — that queue just grows. You end up with excellent visibility into a program that isn’t actually being run.

This is also why “we’re SOC 2 compliant” and “we’re actually secure” are not the same sentence. A dashboard can be green because your controls are well-enforced, or it can be green because someone knows exactly which checkboxes the auditor samples. Both look identical from the dashboard.

Continue reading →
Standard